Apostrophe Puzzles: Is that a Possessive Noun?

A missing or misplaced apostrophe can be a source of irritation to the grammatically astute. But can you really spot an “incorrect” apostrophe? It’s not always so easy as being conscious of possessive forms of speech.

I like to use Farmer’s Market because it’s a frequently cited example.

We use apostrophes when the noun is possessive, so the apostrophe is correct here. Farmer’s is a possessive noun. Isn’t it?

There is another type of noun, not often thought of consciously by many people, that can be confused with possessive nouns. It’s called an attributive noun. Attributives look and act a lot like possessives but, instead of referencing ownership or possession, they simply indicate that there is an association–something is attributed to something else.

So do the farmers actually own the market? Or is it a market for farmers? Or a market of farmers? Or a market by farmers?

Are you still so sure about that apostrophe?

As usual, you will have to consult a few references. If you live in the US, Merriam-Webster is probably where you will want to look. They list farmers market as a nonpossessive noun: “A market at which local farmers sell their agricultural products directly to customers.”

Done. So the apostrophe is incorrect. Get rid of it, and the noun phrase is correct.

Not so fast. Notice that MW also lists the variants: farmers’ market and farmer’s market.

All three are correct? You just have to pick one?

Not quite.

Remember to consider which style guide you are using. AP (often used in the media) does not include the apostrophe for attributive nouns (also known as descriptive nouns). So if you randomly decided to include the apostrophe based on MW, you would not be following the advice of the AP stylebook, so you could be considered wrong if that’s what your document required. See this article for such an interpretation of punctuation rules (it’s a helpful article if you are following AP style). However, if you were supposed to defer to the Chicago Manual of Style, you would have to look for descriptive nouns under genitive case (see 5.20). CMOS keeps the apostrophe for descriptive nouns (the example they give is summer’s day–does summer own the day or does it describe the day?). Therefore, if you were following CMOS–but didn’t include the apostrophe–you could be incorrect unless the noun was definitely not a possessive (see this article for additional discussion on these points).

Unless the apostrophe is decisively possessive, it’s difficult to accuse a writer of being “wrong’ without knowing the style guide.

My Document’s Done! Do I Need a Proofreader or an Editor?

Understanding the lingo of writing and editing professionals

Perhaps you’ve just finished an e-book or you are launching a new business. You want to be sure you are presenting a professional image and that merits the help of a professional in the writing & editing field.

So, you start looking for editors…of which there seem to be numerous kinds: copyeditor, content editor, structural editor, line editor. As you read the descriptions on several websites the definitions seem maybe inconsistent, and you’re still not sure which service your manuscript needs.

Okay, so you’ll hire an editor. They’ll know what to do. But it seems you still need a proofreader? Why an editor and a proofreader?

There are several phases of the editing process. These phases are often called levels of edit or editing passes. They move from a consideration of presentation of thought & organization to a careful (line-by-line) analysis of grammar & syntax. Some editors offer several services and some prefer to focus only on one or two levels.

Common misunderstandings about editing passes include confusion about line editing vs. copyediting and confusion about copyediting vs. proofreading:

Line editing and copyediting are sometimes considered to be the same process, and sometimes they are separately defined. Basically, at this level, editors have already considered the organization and logic of a document and they are now looking very closely at each sentence for consistency, clarity, syntax, and grammar.

Copyediting and proofreading are also sometimes confused. While both copyeditors and proofreaders are looking for grammatical errors, copyeditors are more at liberty to make changes to a text. A proofreader would not suggest wording changes unless a word seemed like a wrong choice missed by the copyeditor (i.e. a word that doesn’t make sense in the sentence). Proofreaders are looking for “surface” errors such as repeated words, spelling mistakes, or extra and missing spaces. They are also looking at formatting (bold headings, font changes, and paragraph indentations). A proofreader will correct grammar–but only if it is “incorrect” in the context of the document. Copyeditors will alter grammar for the sake of refinement and the flow of writing. Proofreaders take the document from copyeditors and read through it a final time before publication.

If you are unsure whether you need an editor or a proofreader, ask for an evaluation of your manuscript.

For a complimentary sample edit, contact me here. (In my own practice, I refer to two levels of editing: developmental editing (organization and thought process) and mechanical/surface editing (copyediting & proofreading).

Thoughts for the Month: From Outline to Final Draft

Last month I wrote about mind mapping: a method of brainstorming that is often helpful in identifying a topic and defining a topic to write about.

Do you have your topic?

I have also chosen a topic–I thought it would be preferable if I refer to a specific example rather than speak in the abstract as I demonstrate an approach to beginning drafting an article or essay. 

My topic is Digital Organizing (this will really be the topic of next month’s Thoughts for the Month).

I know many of you are not new to writing and may be resistant to reading a blog post that appears to be speaking to beginners or assumes that people who visit my site don’t know the basics of writing. Before you all take offense, please consider that some visitors to a writer/editor’s website may, in fact, not be highly trained writers, and they may or may not be interested in refining their skills. For some who would like to be more attentive writers, if business as usual has been disrupted by the coronavirus, this may be an opportune time to revise your website or write the newsletter that you have wanted to begin.

Some of my readers are also educators or students, so I will be addressing outlining and revision processes in a way that is applicable to writing for either the internet or academic settings (or specify which is which).

The inspiration for this post actually stems from my own process as a writer (and somewhat from what I have frequently observed in student papers). 

I never used to write from an outline. I found them restricting, overly formal, and stifling to the creative process. I still don’t always write an official outline before a first draft, but I have begun to at least mentally following a set of guidelines to keep my writing focused–and I must admit, my readability is often improved. 

Typically, as taught in most composition courses, the first step in the outline process is to identify a thesis statement (academic or essay-style writing). If you are writing a blog post you will want a clear CTA, or Call to Action, especially for sales or public awareness blogs. These should be 1 sentence statements, and they are the focusing reason for why you are writing something to be read in the first place. 

Although a thesis and a CTA should be identified before fleshing out the remainder of the essay, they are not necessarily the first sentence. Typically, a thesis statement is required as the last sentence of the first paragraph (less frequently, it may appear in the last paragraph). A CTA is often toward the end of a blog post–maybe the last sentence.

Since this article is an overview, I’m not going to discuss crafting a CTA or a thesis statement in much detail–there are plenty of resources (including those linked) demonstrating these techniques. I’m demonstrating the outline and revision process, since I’m outlining a blog post, I’ll start with a CTA. 

As I said earlier in this post, my topic is digital organization, and now that I have a simple CTA, I can begin my outline:

Writing the Blog Post Outline

  • CTA: Let’s get organized!
  • Introduction: The clutter of years of paper accumulations.
  • Paragraph 1: Digital organization apps. Are they a solution for you?
  • Paragraph 2: Choosing from the array of available organization apps
  • Paragraph 3: My favorites, Evernote, Asana, Dropbox, Trello, and Google Drive.
  • Paragraph 4: Approaching the challenge/integrating new habits.
  • Paragraph 5: Results!
  • Conclusion–my conclusion is my CTA.

With the above outline, I can keep myself on track and not diverge into a subtopic like, say, the relaxation app that I found while I was searching for organization apps (but I may or may not flag that as a topic for a later post if it is something along the lines of what I would write about).

The Revision Process

From my outline above, I’ll be able to write a clear and focused first draft, but I will still want to check myself with a revision and self-edit.

When I revise a first draft I look specifically at my paragraphs, ensuring that each has a focusing topic sentence (such as those in the outline) and that each subsequent sentence is on-topic according to that first sentence. The final sentence of each paragraph should be written as a transition statement from one topic to the next.

This phase will be more complex with a 15-page term paper than it is with a 500-word blog post. When approaching research papers, I often advise directing considerable attention to paragraphing. In the paragraph margins, I notate the main points of each sentence to provide myself with a visual of where I might be drifting off-topic and how I need to reorganize. I also reread the first and last paragraphs to be sure that my introduction and conclusion are aligned.

Getting to Final Draft

Once I have followed the steps above, I should almost be ready to publish my post  (or turn in my paper). But first–a little attention to self-editing can go a long way. Or perhaps I should say, leave more time for editing than you think you will need. If you are able (some classes require this)–grab a partner for peer-review editing. Read, Write, Think provides an effective self and peer-review editing checklist.

Now that we’ve gone from brainstorming to final draft, we’re probably ready to figure out how to file all of the research material that resulted from this process. Fortunately, as you know, next month’s post addresses digital organizing.

See you then!